‘Simply Not True!’ Jeffrey Goldberg Obliterates Mike Waltz for Claiming They Had ‘Never Communicated’ Prior to Infamous Leaked Chat

The unfolding drama surrounding the Signal group chat scandal reveals far more than just sloppy communications practices – it exposes a disturbing pattern of casual disregard for national security protocols at the highest levels of the previous administration. At the heart of this controversy lies a simple, damning truth: senior Trump officials treated classified military operations with all the gravity of a group text planning a weekend barbecue.

Goldberg’s revelation about real-time discussions of imminent airstrikes should send chills down every American’s spine. We’re not talking about after-action reports or historical analyses, but live operational details – the kind of information that literally meant life or death for American pilots. That such sensitive material was being bandied about on an encrypted messaging platform, with apparently zero controls over who might see it, demonstrates a breathtaking arrogance about the sacred duty to protect national security secrets.

Waltz’s increasingly implausible denials only compound the problem. His “sucked into the phone” explanation would be laughable if the stakes weren’t so serious. The emerging evidence of prior contact with Goldberg suggests either deliberate leaking or such reckless handling of classified information that the distinction barely matters. Either scenario represents a fundamental breach of the trust placed in national security officials.

This incident raises urgent questions that demand answers: How many other unauthorized individuals might have had access to similarly sensitive discussions? What other operational secrets were treated with such cavalier disregard? And most importantly – what systemic failures allowed this culture of carelessness to flourish at the highest levels of our national security apparatus?

The damage here extends beyond any single security breach. When those entrusted with our nation’s most sensitive secrets treat them so lightly, it erodes the very foundations of responsible governance. That’s not just a security failure – it’s a profound betrayal of the men and women who put their lives on the line based on the assumption that their operations will be protected with the utmost seriousness.