Former ISIS Supporter Who Came to the UK and Was Later Jailed Twice for Terrorism Leaves People in Shock After They Discover Where He Is Now Secretly Living in the UK

A man who was jailed twice for terrorism-related offences is reportedly living in a three-bedroom flat worth £300,000 in north London, despite concerns about his past activities and the messages he continues to share online.

Mohammed Mizanur Rahman, 43, was once a close associate of Anjem Choudary, a well-known extremist preacher who is now serving a life sentence for leading a banned terrorist organisation.

Rahman was first sent to prison in 2007 after making disturbing comments about British soldiers fighting in Iraq. He said he wanted British troops to return home in body bags and spoke about wanting to see their blood on the streets of Baghdad. His comments led to a four-year prison sentence.

In 2016, Rahman was convicted again alongside Choudary after they pledged their support to Islamic State, also known as ISIS. Both men received prison sentences of five and a half years.

However, according to an investigation by the Daily Mail, Rahman is now living in a heavily subsidised three-bedroom property worth around £300,000 in north London. The home is reportedly located close to primary schools.

The report has raised concerns because Rahman continues to express controversial views about Britain and other Western countries. He has described the UK as part of an “axis of evil” alongside the United States and Israel.

Despite his previous convictions, Rahman is reportedly active on TikTok, where he shares religious and political messages that critics believe could influence young people.

He has also written several books under the name Abu Baraa. Some of these books were previously available through Waterstones and TikTok’s online shop but have since been removed from both platforms. However, the report claims that they remain available on Amazon.

One of his books, titled What Is Known From Islam By Necessity, contains controversial statements about religion, women and people of other faiths.

According to the report, the book encourages readers to prepare for jihad and claims that women should not leave their homes without permission from their husbands. It also contains hostile statements about Jewish people, describing them as unbelievers who will face punishment in the afterlife.

Rahman reportedly works as an accountant and also runs a consultancy business that provides cultural education services.

His activities have attracted criticism from security experts, including Professor Anthony Glees, who believes Rahman could pose a serious threat to national security.

Professor Glees expressed concern that someone with Rahman’s history could continue sharing extremist messages, particularly with teenagers and young people who may be easily influenced.

He warned that Rahman’s online activities and publications could encourage vulnerable individuals to accept dangerous extremist beliefs.

The professor also questioned why books containing such messages had been allowed to appear on major retail platforms.

According to Professor Glees, the concern is not simply about Rahman’s past convictions but also about the possibility that his current activities could encourage others to support or commit acts of violence.

He believes Rahman is attempting to convince impressionable young Muslims that violent Islamist extremists should not be regarded as terrorists or killers.

Professor Glees has called on counter-terrorism police to investigate Rahman’s activities and take appropriate action before anyone is harmed.

The report has also drawn attention to the fact that Rahman is reportedly living in subsidised accommodation despite his previous terrorism convictions and continued controversial public statements.

However, the report does not establish that Rahman has committed any new criminal offence or that his current online activities have been found unlawful.

Professor Glees maintains that the authorities should take the concerns seriously, particularly because of Rahman’s previous involvement with extremist organisations and his continued influence on social media.